From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/26120 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Steinar Bang Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: charset="Windows-1252" Date: 02 Nov 1999 11:02:21 +0100 Organization: NCR METIS Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: <9t9u2n5b4o7.fsf@mraz.iskon.hr> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035163387 17703 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 01:23:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 01:23:07 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from lisa.math.uh.edu (lisa.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.49]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id FAA10105 for ; Tue, 2 Nov 1999 05:02:53 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by lisa.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id EAB15393; Tue, 2 Nov 1999 04:02:51 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Tue, 02 Nov 1999 04:03:09 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id EAA29323 for ; Tue, 2 Nov 1999 04:02:56 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from viffer.oslo.metis.no (sb@viffer.oslo.metis.no [195.0.254.249]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id FAA10100 for ; Tue, 2 Nov 1999 05:02:23 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: (from sb@localhost) by viffer.oslo.metis.no (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA04981; Tue, 2 Nov 1999 11:02:21 +0100 Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: Hrvoje Niksic's message of "02 Nov 1999 10:53:28 +0100" Original-Lines: 33 User-Agent: Gnus/5.07009701 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.97.1) XEmacs/20.4 (Emerald) Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:26120 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:26120 >>>>> Hrvoje Niksic : > Steinar Bang writes: >> That would be the correct solution. AFAIK "Windows-1252" isn't a >> legal charset parameter to text/plain. > Why not? Because of this statement from section 4.1.2 (not 4.1.1 as I said earlier. Sorry!) of RFC2046. at the bottom of page 9: The defined charset values are: (1) US-ASCII -- as defined in ANSI X3.4-1986 [US-ASCII]. (2) ISO-8859-X -- where "X" is to be replaced, as necessary, for the parts of ISO-8859 [ISO-8859]. Note that the ISO 646 character sets have deliberately been omitted in favor of their 8859 replacements, which are the designated character sets for Internet mail. As of the publication of this document, the legitimate values for "X" are the digits 1 through 10. For easy reference: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2046.txt > Several years ago, people from Microsoft bothered to register their > charsets at ISO. At least I believe I've found windows-1250 (aka > CP1250, used for Croatian characters) over there. And...? IIRC "Windows-1252" is "extended ISO-8859-1", with additional crud in both the control character positions, and the range 128-159.