From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/11801 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Steinar Bang Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: splitting .newsrc.eld Date: 28 Jul 1997 09:04:49 +0200 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.105) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035151454 32618 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 22:04:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 22:04:14 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from xemacs.org (xemacs.cs.uiuc.edu [128.174.252.16]) by altair.xemacs.org (8.8.6/8.8.6) with ESMTP id BAA06459 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 1997 01:08:48 -0700 Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id DAA10722 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 1997 03:04:53 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from claymore.vcinet.com (claymore.vcinet.com [208.205.12.23]) by ifi.uio.no with SMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Mon, 28 Jul 1997 09:07:21 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 24511 invoked by uid 504); 28 Jul 1997 07:07:19 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 24508 invoked from network); 28 Jul 1997 07:07:14 -0000 Original-Received: from abel.metis.no (HELO gw.metis.no) (193.90.64.1) by claymore.vcinet.com with SMTP; 28 Jul 1997 07:07:12 -0000 Original-Received: by gw.metis.no (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id JAA28272; Mon, 28 Jul 1997 09:06:37 +0200 (MET DST) Original-Received: by metis.no (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id JAA27678; Mon, 28 Jul 1997 09:06:34 +0200 (MET DST) Original-Received: by norne.troll.no (8.8.4/8.8.4) id JAA18542; Mon, 28 Jul 1997 09:04:50 +0200 (MET DST) Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of "25 Jul 1997 20:51:20 +0200" Original-Lines: 11 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.56/Emacs 19.34 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:11801 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:11801 >>>>> Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen : > Steinar Bang writes: >> It's the part which takes the longest time to save, everytime you save >> the file. It's the least valuable (to me) part of the file. > Yes, but it'll have to be saved anyway, so I don't quite see how > splitting helps much... The smaller the file, the shorter time it needs to complete a write, the shorter the risk for corruption.