From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/30916 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Steinar Bang Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: The .. rule Date: 14 May 2000 21:46:53 +0200 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: <00May12.111709edt.115683@gateway.intersys.com> <200005121547.RAA12153@marcy.cs.uni-dortmund.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035167387 11072 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 02:29:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 02:29:47 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from lisa.math.uh.edu (lisa.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.49]) by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37DA8D051F for ; Sun, 14 May 2000 15:47:25 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by lisa.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAB22482; Sun, 14 May 2000 14:47:24 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Sun, 14 May 2000 14:46:51 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from mailhost.sclp.com (postfix@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA14283 for ; Sun, 14 May 2000 14:46:41 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from viffer.metis.no (c235s252-h3t13.chello.no [212.186.252.235]) by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5888D051F for ; Sun, 14 May 2000 15:46:57 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: (from sb@localhost) by viffer.metis.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) id VAA24499; Sun, 14 May 2000 21:46:53 +0200 Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: Karl Kleinpaste's message of "14 May 2000 15:35:35 -0400" Original-Lines: 11 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) XEmacs/20.4 (Emerald) Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:30916 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:30916 >>>>> Karl Kleinpaste : > ... that the apparent vast majority who don't like it should get the > previous default regexp back, which only matches real, legitimate > URLs. Ah! So you have a pipeline into "the vast majority's" opionions? I see. I'm impressed.