From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/11710 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Steinar Bang Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: repost and message-ID Date: 18 Jul 1997 14:27:34 +0200 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.105) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035151376 31994 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 22:02:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 22:02:56 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from xemacs.org (xemacs.cs.uiuc.edu [128.174.252.16]) by altair.xemacs.org (8.8.6/8.8.6) with ESMTP id GAA09093 for ; Fri, 18 Jul 1997 06:17:27 -0700 Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id IAA07768 for ; Fri, 18 Jul 1997 08:14:07 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from claymore.vcinet.com (claymore.vcinet.com [208.205.12.23]) by ifi.uio.no with SMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Fri, 18 Jul 1997 14:29:52 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 18130 invoked by uid 504); 18 Jul 1997 12:29:50 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 18127 invoked from network); 18 Jul 1997 12:29:49 -0000 Original-Received: from abel.metis.no (HELO gw.metis.no) (193.90.64.1) by claymore.vcinet.com with SMTP; 18 Jul 1997 12:29:47 -0000 Original-Received: by gw.metis.no (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id OAA05498; Fri, 18 Jul 1997 14:29:15 +0200 (MET DST) Original-Received: by mailhub.metis.no (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id OAA15259; Fri, 18 Jul 1997 14:29:08 +0200 (MET DST) Original-Received: by norne.troll.no (8.8.4/8.8.4) id OAA08935; Fri, 18 Jul 1997 14:27:35 +0200 (MET DST) Original-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 28 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.56/Emacs 19.34 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:11710 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:11710 What's the rationale for Gnus giving a new message-ID for reposted articles, that has not otherwise changed? The reason I'm asking, is that I have recently been operation a foreign group, for a group that already exists on the native NNTP server. When posting, I have occasionally forgotten to do C-u 1 C-c C-c and instead done just C-c C-c I've then picked up the "*sent followup..." buffer, and done C-u 1 C-c C-c Gnus has then asked me two times, if I really want to repost it, and then posted it to the foreign server. Now the problem was that the native server had picked them up, and when it came back online, it promptly posted the old articles, that I thought would be discarded on having the same message ids, as those posted on the foreign server. A few came in up to 4 copies, from when I was experimenting with how to make postings on the foreign group, go to the foreign server. - Steinar