From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/10768 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Steinar Bang Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: While talking about cancelling.. Date: 22 Apr 1997 13:12:49 +0200 Sender: sb@norne.metis.no Message-ID: References: <199704161353.PAA03966@hubert.fukt.hk-r.se> <0fhgh7573e.fsf@asgaard.mjolner.dk> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.105) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035150583 26271 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:49:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:49:43 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id EAA16397 for ; Tue, 22 Apr 1997 04:27:56 -0700 Original-Received: from claymore.vcinet.com (claymore.vcinet.com [208.205.12.23]) by ifi.uio.no with SMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Tue, 22 Apr 1997 13:13:36 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 6608 invoked by uid 504); 22 Apr 1997 11:11:14 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 6605 invoked from network); 22 Apr 1997 11:11:12 -0000 Original-Received: from abel.metis.no (HELO gw.metis.no) (193.90.64.1) by claymore.vcinet.com with SMTP; 22 Apr 1997 11:11:09 -0000 Original-Received: by gw.metis.no (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id NAA02725; Tue, 22 Apr 1997 13:12:54 +0200 (MET DST) Original-Received: by mailhub.metis.no (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id NAA13862; Tue, 22 Apr 1997 13:12:50 +0200 (MET DST) Original-Received: by norne.metis.no (8.8.4/8.8.4) id NAA03273; Tue, 22 Apr 1997 13:12:49 +0200 (MET DST) Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of 19 Apr 1997 03:52:45 +0200 Original-Lines: 10 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.42/Emacs 19.34 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:10768 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:10768 >>>>> Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen : > Yes, the whole canceling thing needs a rethink. It's way too hard > to cancel articles now if you post from different machines, for > instance, or when you cancel from different servers, or in a > situation like this. In addition, cancelling needs to be coordinated with posting styles, when that goes back in (to get the valid sender address to cancel for).