From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/18845 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Steinar Bang Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: MIME composition (was: Storing the group a message has been written to) Date: 18 Nov 1998 10:55:57 +0100 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: <199811161945.OAA24469@alderaan.gsfc.nasa.gov> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.108) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035157301 8410 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 23:41:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 23:41:41 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from karazm.math.uh.edu (karazm.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.1]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id EAA05819 for ; Wed, 18 Nov 1998 04:56:27 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by karazm.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id DAB07658; Wed, 18 Nov 1998 03:56:17 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Wed, 18 Nov 1998 03:56:13 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id DAA29000 for ; Wed, 18 Nov 1998 03:56:05 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from viffer.oslo.metis.no (viffer.oslo.metis.no [195.0.254.249]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id EAA05814 for ; Wed, 18 Nov 1998 04:55:57 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: (from sb@localhost) by viffer.oslo.metis.no (8.8.7/8.8.7) id KAA20635; Wed, 18 Nov 1998 10:55:57 +0100 Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: Per Abrahamsen's message of "17 Nov 1998 18:45:34 +0100" Original-Lines: 19 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.6.42/XEmacs 20.4 - "Emerald" Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:18845 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:18845 >>>>> Per Abrahamsen : > Steinar Bang writes: >> >>>>> Per Abrahamsen : >> >> > Then again, it can also be implemented in terms of plain MIME. I'm >> > not sure going through MML would offer any benefits. Plain MIME >> > _is_ a markup language, >> >> I don't think message composers should be forced to deal with plain >> MIME... > In the above, _it_ referred to the hypothetical widget-based > front-end. I don't think MML would be a benefit when implementing > _it_. OK. How does the widget-based front end cooperate with autosave and save to folders? If this has been covered earlier, I apologize. I've lost track of all threads of this discussion.