From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/8538
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Steinar Bang <sb@metis.no>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: New sketch
Date: 30 Oct 1996 12:04:12 +0100
Sender: sb@metis.no
Message-ID: <whiv7s3e8j.fsf@norne.metis.no>
References: <w8slocp3apx.fsf@hrym.ifi.uio.no> <rv3eyxwk35.fsf@sdnp5.ucsd.edu> <w8szq155ufm.fsf@ylfing.ifi.uio.no> <rv20ehwdte.fsf@sdnp5.ucsd.edu> <w8sd8y148ey.fsf@hrym.ifi.uio.no> <w8s918p47lf.fsf@hrym.ifi.uio.no> <w8s7mo946ap.fsf@hrym.ifi.uio.no>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.84)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035148682 12699 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:18:02 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:18:02 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <ding-request@ifi.uio.no>
Original-Received: (qmail 28310 invoked from smtpd); 30 Oct 1996 11:56:04 -0000
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@129.240.64.2)
  by deanna.miranova.com with SMTP; 30 Oct 1996 11:56:03 -0000
Original-Received: from gw.metis.no (abel.metis.no [193.90.64.1]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <MAA00141@ifi.uio.no> for <ding@ifi.uio.no> ; Wed, 30 Oct 1996 12:04:48 +0100
Original-Received: by gw.metis.no (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id MAA27785; Wed, 30 Oct 1996 12:04:17 +0100
Original-Received: by hub.metis.no (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id MAA11458; Wed, 30 Oct 1996 12:04:13 +0100
Original-Received: by client.metis.no (8.6.11/8.6.12) id MAA03931; Wed, 30 Oct 1996 12:04:12 +0100
Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no
In-Reply-To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of 30 Oct 1996 01:58:06 +0100
Original-Lines: 15
X-Mailer: Red Gnus v0.52/Emacs 19.34
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:8538
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:8538

>>>>> Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@ifi.uio.no>:

> Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@hrym.ifi.uio.no> writes:
>> I've now fiddled with it some -- I've unsquashed the r's and flipped
>> the n's as well:
>> <URL:http://www.ifi.uio.no/~larsi/rgnus/shirt/edit.ps>. 

> So -- does it look ok?  Or do you prefer the unflipped version?  I
> dunno myself...  The flipped letters do look weird, which is good, but
> is it too cliched?  

Weeell, Tovarich.... I would prefer plain old "Proletariat" to
"Proletcult". 

Call me a traditionalist, but that's just the way I am.