From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/8853 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Steinar Bang Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: adaptive word score, and numbers Date: 20 Nov 1996 15:50:19 +0100 Sender: sb@metis.no Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.93) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035148966 14821 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:22:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:22:46 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 31271 invoked from smtpd); 20 Nov 1996 15:24:50 -0000 Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@129.240.64.2) by deanna.miranova.com with SMTP; 20 Nov 1996 15:24:47 -0000 Original-Received: from gw.metis.no (abel.metis.no [193.90.64.1]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Wed, 20 Nov 1996 15:50:52 +0100 Original-Received: by gw.metis.no (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id PAA03049; Wed, 20 Nov 1996 15:50:20 +0100 Original-Received: by hub.metis.no (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id PAA15492; Wed, 20 Nov 1996 15:50:19 +0100 Original-Received: by client.metis.no (8.6.11/8.6.12) id PAA29159; Wed, 20 Nov 1996 15:50:19 +0100 Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no In-Reply-To: Steinar Bang's message of 19 Nov 1996 08:02:52 +0100 Original-Lines: 18 X-Mailer: Red Gnus v0.60/Emacs 19.34 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:8853 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:8853 >>>>> Steinar Bang : >> (setq gnus-adaptive-word-syntax-table >> (copy-syntax-table (standard-syntax-table))) >> (modify-syntax-entry ?- "w" gnus-adaptive-word-syntax-table) >> (By the way, by default, numbers are considered to be white space when >> doing word scoring.) > Yup! I'll look into changing it, and what effects it would have. OK. So now I've checked with gnus-score.el, and if I've understood this correctly, the default is standard-syntax-table, explicitly minus numbers...? Hmm... what's the reason for not counting numbers as words? Since you've explicitly removed them, I assume this is deliberate, but I can't immediately see the reason for it...?