From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/31251 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Steinar Bang Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: denying nnimap server causes nnimap-close-group to crash Date: 01 Jun 2000 13:10:22 +0200 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035167687 12974 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 02:34:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 02:34:47 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from karazm.math.uh.edu (karazm.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.1]) by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00987D051E for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2000 07:14:53 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by karazm.math.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id GAC16712; Thu, 1 Jun 2000 06:11:25 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Thu, 01 Jun 2000 06:10:49 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from mailhost.sclp.com (postfix@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id GAA23829 for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2000 06:10:39 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from viffer.computas.no (c235s252-h3t13.chello.no [212.186.252.235]) by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8784FD051E for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2000 07:11:02 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: (from sb@localhost) by viffer.computas.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) id NAA19425; Thu, 1 Jun 2000 13:10:56 +0200 Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: Simon Josefsson's message of "31 May 2000 20:42:39 +0200" User-Agent: Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) XEmacs/20.4 (Emerald) Original-Lines: 14 Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:31251 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:31251 >>>>> Simon Josefsson : > Steinar Bang writes: >> Would it be possible to make Gnus open agentized denied servers in >> the unplugged state, without having to open the servers in the >> server buffer? > Wouldn't that be kind of unexpected? If you tell Gnus the server is > denied, you'd expect it to remain denied, wouldn't you? I didn't. I expected "denied" to deal with network traffic, and I expected to be able to read agent-cached articles in unplugged mode for groups belonging to these servers.