From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/10007
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Steinar Bang <sb@metis.no>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Preformatting features of Emacs
Date: 28 Feb 1997 15:12:04 +0100
Sender: sb@norne.metis.no
Message-ID: <whpvxlnhor.fsf@norne.metis.no>
References: <kigk9ntrzef.fsf@jagor.srce.hr> <rjohd52mkr.fsf@zuse.dina.kvl.dk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.93)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035149945 21816 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:39:05 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:39:05 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <ding-request@ifi.uio.no>
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2])
	by deanna.miranova.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id LAA05412
	for <steve@miranova.com>; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:14:12 -0800
Original-Received: from gw.metis.no (abel.metis.no [193.90.64.1]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <PAA05411@ifi.uio.no> for <ding@ifi.uio.no> ; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 15:12:40 +0100
Original-Received: by gw.metis.no (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id PAA24877; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 15:12:08 +0100 (MET)
Original-Received: by mailhub.metis.no (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id PAA03471; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 15:12:03 +0100 (MET)
Original-Received: by norne.metis.no (8.8.4/8.8.4) id PAA14850; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 15:12:05 +0100 (MET)
Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no
In-Reply-To: Per Abrahamsen's message of 28 Feb 1997 12:32:04 +0100
Original-Lines: 22
X-Mailer: Red Gnus v0.82/Emacs 19.34
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:10007
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:10007

>>>>> Per Abrahamsen <abraham@dina.kvl.dk>:

> One ought to be able to readjust `gnus-article-fill-cited-article' for
> use in message-mode.  This is much more powerful than VIM's wimpy
> filling.  To do it cleanly, the parsing part of `gnus-cite.el' should
> be made independent of gnus.  This would be a good idea anyway.

> The good news is that this is already on my projects list. 
> The bad news is that it had been there for a long time.

Hm... when you're at it,... will it be possible to handle 
"other-peoples-quoted-text-broken-by-netscape"?  Ie. the results of
long quoted lines hitting Netscape's break-at-72-chars-when-sending,
something like this:

>> afsdf adsdsfdasf asdf asdfadsf asdfasdf adsf adsf addfasf
fasdfad
>> sfdasdfa dasfadsf fdsfafd afdf
fadsfa
> asdfadsfadfadsf dfsadsf dsf asdfadfkjf;kljf;kjhf asfajhjh 
fdshkashjd 
> dsfhaksdfhakf