From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/9381
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Steinar Bang <sb@metis.no>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Can't move article! (in nnml folders)
Date: 11 Jan 1997 16:20:27 +0100
Sender: sb@norne.metis.no
Message-ID: <whpvzcutl0.fsf@norne.metis.no>
References: <whybe1o4oh.fsf@tyr.metis.no> <ufaloa1h0yz.fsf@sina.hpc.uh.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.93)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035149417 18148 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:30:17 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:30:17 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <ding-request@ifi.uio.no>
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2])
          by deanna.miranova.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP
	  id HAA13071 for <steve@miranova.com>; Sat, 11 Jan 1997 07:31:48 -0800
Original-Received: from gw.metis.no (abel.metis.no [193.90.64.1]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <QAA15169@ifi.uio.no> for <ding@ifi.uio.no> ; Sat, 11 Jan 1997 16:21:03 +0100
Original-Received: by gw.metis.no (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id QAA10973; Sat, 11 Jan 1997 16:20:30 +0100 (MET)
Original-Received: by mailhub.metis.no (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id QAA02016; Sat, 11 Jan 1997 16:20:29 +0100 (MET)
Original-Received: by norne.metis.no (8.8.4/8.8.4) id QAA07135; Sat, 11 Jan 1997 16:20:28 +0100 (MET)
Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no
In-Reply-To: Jason L Tibbitts III's message of 10 Jan 1997 11:52:20 -0600
Original-Lines: 19
X-Mailer: Red Gnus v0.80/Emacs 19.34
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9381
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9381

>>>>> Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs@hpc.uh.edu>:

>>>>> "SB" == Steinar Bang <sb@metis.no> writes:
SB> Or am I the only one seeing this behaviour (I've been seeing it for as
SB> long as I've had nnml folders, which may be all the way back to the
SB> vanilla Gnus of 19.34 (version number escapes me, at the moment)).

> No, I've seen it too.  It's only recently that I started trying to move
> articles at all and I just figured it had something to do with something
> else that I didn't understand very well but haven't had time to
> investigate.

OK! I won't report this as a bug, until someone tells me that this
isn't expected behaviour, when I've set resource so, or so...

Lars?


- Steinar