From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/30415 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Steinar Bang Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: More on forwarding quoted-printable encoded messages Date: 26 Apr 2000 15:57:00 +0200 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: <87d7qc557e.fsf@psyche.evansnet> <2n8zy1l1ug.fsf@tiger.jia.vnet> <2nem7t0yab.fsf@tiger.jia.vnet> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035166956 8353 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 02:22:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 02:22:36 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from lisa.math.uh.edu (lisa.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.49]) by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7266D051E for ; Wed, 26 Apr 2000 09:57:24 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by lisa.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id IAB29413; Wed, 26 Apr 2000 08:57:23 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Wed, 26 Apr 2000 08:56:53 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from mailhost.sclp.com (postfix@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA22436 for ; Wed, 26 Apr 2000 08:56:42 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from viffer.metis.no (viffer.oslo.metis.no [195.0.254.249]) by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49AD1D051E for ; Wed, 26 Apr 2000 09:57:01 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: (from sb@localhost) by viffer.metis.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) id PAA14436; Wed, 26 Apr 2000 15:57:00 +0200 Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: Shenghuo ZHU's message of "26 Apr 2000 09:47:24 -0400" Original-Lines: 6 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0805 (Gnus v5.8.5) XEmacs/20.4 (Emerald) Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:30415 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:30415 >>>>> Shenghuo ZHU : > I think it is better to let user choose whether to forward a message > untouched or re-encoded. I agree.