From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/19348 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Steinar Bang Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: off-topic: MIME type for EPS? Date: 30 Nov 1998 15:33:01 +0100 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035157713 11118 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 23:48:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 23:48:33 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from karazm.math.uh.edu (karazm.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.1]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA17694 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 1998 09:33:41 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by karazm.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id IAB05831; Mon, 30 Nov 1998 08:33:24 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Mon, 30 Nov 1998 08:33:24 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id IAA03640 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 1998 08:33:14 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from viffer.oslo.metis.no (viffer.oslo.metis.no [195.0.254.249]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA17682 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 1998 09:33:05 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: (from sb@localhost) by viffer.oslo.metis.no (8.8.7/8.8.7) id PAA14053; Mon, 30 Nov 1998 15:33:01 +0100 Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE's message of "30 Nov 1998 15:17:43 +0100" Original-Lines: 9 User-Agent: Gnus/5.070055 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.55) XEmacs/20.4 (Emerald) Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:19348 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:19348 >>>>> Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE: > Is there a MIME content-type for Encapsulated Postscript? What is it? > If there is none, should one use application/postscript instead, or > application/octet-stream? application/postscript looks like the logical choice. The type was defined in the draft base MIME definition RFC1522. I don't know where it finally ended up.