From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/29137 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Steinar Bang Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Email address handling Date: 07 Feb 2000 18:56:26 +0100 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035165860 1081 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 02:04:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 02:04:20 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from lisa.math.uh.edu (lisa.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.49]) by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF31FD051E for ; Tue, 8 Feb 2000 01:53:16 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by lisa.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id AAB11955; Tue, 8 Feb 2000 00:53:02 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Tue, 08 Feb 2000 00:52:28 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from mailhost.sclp.com (postfix@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA28262 for ; Tue, 8 Feb 2000 00:52:19 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from viffer.metis.no (viffer.oslo.metis.no [195.0.254.249]) by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACA01D051E for ; Tue, 8 Feb 2000 01:52:09 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: (from sb@localhost) by viffer.metis.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) id HAA06626; Tue, 8 Feb 2000 07:52:02 +0100 Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: Colin Rafferty's message of "07 Feb 2000 10:26:29 -0500" User-Agent: Gnus/5.0804 (Gnus v5.8.4) XEmacs/20.4 (Emerald) Original-Lines: 11 Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:29137 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:29137 >>>>> Colin Rafferty : >> I think the problem is that message ids should also be clickable in >> message bodies? > Yes, that is a different issue, but it seems to me that the ratio of > message-id/email in message bodies is significantly insignificant. Hm... I have seen many occasions where people have posted message-id's of other articles (mostly on news). Many more than I have seen email addresses I would like to use with a click.