From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/32300 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Steinar Bang Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: nnml -> nnimap (preserving Xrefs) Date: 01 Sep 2000 12:36:58 +0200 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: <52em3770ov.fsf@sean.ebone.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035168593 18934 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 02:49:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 02:49:53 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from spinoza.math.uh.edu (spinoza.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.18]) by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5AAED051E for ; Fri, 1 Sep 2000 06:38:42 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by spinoza.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id FAC16400; Fri, 1 Sep 2000 05:38:14 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Fri, 01 Sep 2000 05:37:12 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from mailhost.sclp.com (postfix@66-209.196.61.interliant.com [209.196.61.66] (may be forged)) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id FAA17630 for ; Fri, 1 Sep 2000 05:37:02 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from viffer.computas.no (unknown [194.19.98.137]) by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 401E1D051E for ; Fri, 1 Sep 2000 06:37:27 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: (from sb@localhost) by viffer.computas.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) id MAA27199; Fri, 1 Sep 2000 12:37:12 +0200 Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: Simon Josefsson's message of "30 Aug 2000 10:45:54 +0200" User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/20.4 (Emerald) Original-Lines: 10 Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:32300 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:32300 >>>>> Simon Josefsson : > It doesn't. IMAP doesn't support the concept of cross-posting. > Right now, the article is simply copied into all mailboxes. And > until more servers support the ANNOTATE draft, there's no way we can > attach any (such as a Xref header) information on the article. Hm... does the annotate draft open for replacements of headers? Or does it only allow insertion of new ones? (I'm thinking of re-parenting of articles)