From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/21460 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Steinar Bang Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Just when I thought I had seen it all... Date: 23 Feb 1999 15:38:05 +0100 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: <87ww1qa9if.fsf@pc-hrvoje.srce.hr> <87hfsdtkw4.fsf@pc-hrvoje.srce.hr> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035159559 23063 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 00:19:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 00:19:19 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from fisher.math.uh.edu (fisher.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.35]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA10146 for ; Tue, 23 Feb 1999 09:39:20 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by fisher.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id IAB03936; Tue, 23 Feb 1999 08:38:33 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Tue, 23 Feb 1999 08:38:54 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id IAA11189 for ; Tue, 23 Feb 1999 08:38:45 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from viffer.oslo.metis.no (sb@viffer.oslo.metis.no [195.0.254.249]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA10138 for ; Tue, 23 Feb 1999 09:38:31 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: (from sb@localhost) by viffer.oslo.metis.no (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA05034; Tue, 23 Feb 1999 15:38:06 +0100 Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: François Pinard's message of "23 Feb 1999 09:26:44 -0500" Original-Lines: 12 User-Agent: Gnus/5.070065 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.65) XEmacs/20.4 (Emerald) Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:21460 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:21460 >>>>> François Pinard : > Seriously, yes, I sometimes use `nndoc' myself. But each time I do, > I have the feeling that something is missing in Gnus, and I go > through `nndoc' around the limitation. Is nndoc the thing fired off when you do C-d in the summary buffer? If so, I rather like it, and have used it to step my way through forwarded articles and digests and even to reply to and forward individual messages in a digest. Damn! I thought it was a _feature_, and a rather good one...! :-)