From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/26117 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Steinar Bang Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: charset="Windows-1252" Date: 02 Nov 1999 10:21:13 +0100 Organization: NCR METIS Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035163385 17693 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 01:23:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 01:23:05 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from lisa.math.uh.edu (lisa.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.49]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id EAA09953 for ; Tue, 2 Nov 1999 04:24:10 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by lisa.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id DAB16266; Tue, 2 Nov 1999 03:24:01 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Tue, 02 Nov 1999 03:23:17 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id DAA28926 for ; Tue, 2 Nov 1999 03:23:08 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from viffer.oslo.metis.no (sb@viffer.oslo.metis.no [195.0.254.249]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id EAA09938 for ; Tue, 2 Nov 1999 04:21:14 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: (from sb@localhost) by viffer.oslo.metis.no (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA04855; Tue, 2 Nov 1999 10:21:13 +0100 Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: Karl Eichwalder's message of "01 Nov 1999 23:02:00 +0100" Original-Lines: 9 User-Agent: Gnus/5.07009701 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.97.1) XEmacs/20.4 (Emerald) Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:26117 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:26117 >>>>> Karl Eichwalder : > Any chance to work around the problem? Or should I try to convince > people to use ISO charsets? That would be the correct solution. AFAIK "Windows-1252" isn't a legal charset parameter to text/plain. See RFC2046, section 4.1.1 (or http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2046.txt for those who doesn't have Simon's nifty "RFC button thingy").