Re: Replacing duplicate "Re:"s and it's compantions?

Re: Replacing duplicate "Re:"s and it's compantions?

[Jesper Harder]

Jonas Steverud <d4jonas@dtek.chalmers.se> writes:

> I was told that there existed some regexp-variables
> that was used for matching "Re:".  The problem is that I forgot which
> variables.

Perhaps you are looking for message-subject-re-regexp

-- 
Jesper Harder, <URL: http://purl.org/harder/ >
Søges: Bolig i Århus pr. medio september. Max kr. 3000.

Re: Replacing duplicate "Re:"s and it's compantions?

[Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen]

Jonas Steverud <d4jonas@dtek.chalmers.se> writes:

> Is there a good hook that is run when gnus fetches the headers and
> when it fetches the article (for summary- and article-buffers
> respectely)? I haven't looked into the article treatment very much so
> can't say if I ask a obvious question or not.

There isn't, but you could cheat and use
`gnus-decode-encoded-word-function' to alter the string before having
it run the default function.  Or after.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen

Re: Replacing duplicate "Re:"s and it's compantions?

[Rene H. Larsen]

Jonas Steverud <d4jonas@dtek.chalmers.se> writes:

> Footnotes: 
> [1]  MS OE removes the Re: produced by other software and replaces it
> with "SV:" - Swedish for "Svar" or Answer - and hence it is not
> uncommon with subjectlines that is "SV: SV: SV: SV: SV: SV: ". My
> personal theory is that they "forgot" about checking for already
> existing "SV:"s.

The Danish version of M$ OE does essentially the same thing. Here
"Re:" is replaced by "Sv:". This is just typical Micro$oft brain
damage that should really be fixed at the source, although some sort
of workaround for Gnus would be nice.
-- 
#!/usr/bin/perl -w
for$a(0..12){$b[$a]="|"." "x78}for$a(0..78){substr($b[-(sin($a*3.1415/
22)-1)*6.499],$a,1)="*"}$b[6]=~s/ /-/g;print join("\n",@b),"\n";