old buglets with implicitly creating a group

old buglets with implicitly creating a group

[Jost Krieger]

I have the bad habit of creating a nnml group with B m from time to time.

Problem one: It doesn't show up in the group buffer at all, and I have
to get it via browse (all the Ks, you know), or with a manual G m
afterwards.

Problem two: Why does it go out and check my newsserver for the
presence of the group?

Jost
-- 
| Jost.Krieger@ruhr-uni-bochum.de      Please help stamp out spam! |
| Postmaster, JAPH, resident answer machine          am RZ der RUB |
| Pluralitas non est ponenda sine neccesitate                      |
|                                 William of Ockham (1285-1347/49) |

Re: old buglets with implicitly creating a group

[Kai Großjohann]

Jost Krieger <Jost.Krieger@ruhr-uni-bochum.de> writes:

> I have the bad habit of creating a nnml group with B m from time to time.

What happens if you do `F'?

kai
-- 
I like BOTH kinds of music.

Re: old buglets with implicitly creating a group

[Jack Vinson]

>>>>> "KG" == Kai Großjohann <Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE> writes:

KG> Jost Krieger <Jost.Krieger@ruhr-uni-bochum.de> writes:
>> I have the bad habit of creating a nnml group with B m from time to time.

KG> What happens if you do `F'?

This does nothing.  The group created by 'B m' is immediately stuffed into
the Zombies.  'F' in the *Group* buffer claims there are no new newsgroups.
It only appears if I do 'A z' in the group buffer, from which I can 'u' to
toggle the subscription status.
 
-- 
Jack Vinson
Zippy: Everybody is going somewhere!!  It's probably a garage sale
 or a disaster Movie!!

Re: old buglets with implicitly creating a group

[Jost Krieger]

>>>>> "Jack" == Jack Vinson <vinson@unagi.cis.upenn.edu> writes:

>>>>> "KG" == Kai Großjohann <Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE> writes:
 KG> Jost Krieger <Jost.Krieger@ruhr-uni-bochum.de> writes:
 >>> I have the bad habit of creating a nnml group with B m from time to time.

 KG> What happens if you do `F'?

 > This does nothing.  The group created by 'B m' is immediately stuffed into
 > the Zombies.  'F' in the *Group* buffer claims there are no new newsgroups.
 > It only appears if I do 'A z' in the group buffer, from which I can 'u' to
 > toggle the subscription status.
 
Sorry to interrupt :-)

Unfortunately, I don't get the group anywhere, not even as a zombie,
except when browsing the foreign server, neither with 'F' nor without.

Now this may be dependent on my config settings, which have
accumulated over the years ...

I just found all my old lost groups by manually walking through the
server browse buffer and trying 'u' on each line. Interesting.

Any ideas?

Jost
-- 
| Jost.Krieger@ruhr-uni-bochum.de      Please help stamp out spam! |
| Postmaster, JAPH, resident answer machine          am RZ der RUB |
| Pluralitas non est ponenda sine neccesitate                      |
|                                 William of Ockham (1285-1347/49) |

Re: old buglets with implicitly creating a group

[Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen]

Jost Krieger <Jost.Krieger@ruhr-uni-bochum.de> writes:

> I just found all my old lost groups by manually walking through the
> server browse buffer and trying 'u' on each line. Interesting.

Does stopping and starting Emacs/Gnus help any?

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen