From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/10149 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stainless Steel Rat Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Checking `Reply-To' Date: 09 Mar 1997 17:59:16 -0500 Organization: The Happy Fun Ball Brigade Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035150066 22663 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:41:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:41:06 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id PAA27027 for ; Sun, 9 Mar 1997 15:34:32 -0800 Original-Received: from londo.prescienttech.com (londo.prescienttech.com [199.103.216.62]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Mon, 10 Mar 1997 00:24:13 +0100 Original-Received: from gkar.asds.com (gkar.asds.com [111.17.19.1]) by londo.prescienttech.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id SAA02411 for ; Sun, 9 Mar 1997 18:24:11 -0500 Original-Received: from peorth.gweep.net (gkar.asds.com [111.17.19.1]) by gkar.asds.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id SAA22245 for ; Sun, 9 Mar 1997 18:24:07 -0500 Original-To: "(ding)" X-Attribution: Rat In-Reply-To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of 09 Mar 1997 18:01:16 +0100 Original-Lines: 32 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.24/Emacs 19.34 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:10149 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:10149 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>>>> "tGBGnB" == Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: tGBGnB> You can use `message-default-headers', but why on Earth do you want tGBGnB> to add a Reply-to header? Read RFC-822 some time :). There are plenty of good reasons to generate a Reply-To header. The gist of it is that one uses a Reply-To header when the sender wishes to direct replies to a mailbox other than the one in the - From header. tGBGnB> Why not just make the From header say the right thing in the first tGBGnB> place? Because making the From header say "the right thing" may be incorrect behaviour as far as the mail and news RFCs are concerned. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.3 Charset: cp850 iQCVAwUBMyNAwJ6VRH7BJMxHAQFvlgP/RUTKf9s+Y6KN5Bm4W+KobzG3G5TehH2R 1l2rLQBZXoOAjgxzeaQQ3aKQMGIHAZv/oxMi/rCPuiM9gMPAOgEGnwnJUBVd6Aip ZEj0Qr1e4JWU1f5PROPEwTCw1AdEnuhfVari59RtM0cW/GvRN4dygBde2DAjRl+n 6aDN1lazRCc= =mktp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Rat \ Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball. PGP Key: at a key server near you! \ \