From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/10304
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Stainless Steel Rat <ratinox@peorth.gweep.net>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Gnus v5.4.32 is released
Date: 19 Mar 1997 18:34:38 -0500
Organization: The Happy Fun Ball Brigade
Message-ID: <wksp1r1mnl.fsf@peorth.gweep.net>
References: <m2afnzpr5p.fsf@proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no> <wpg67ynzj0r.fsf@asic.sc.ti.com> <m27mj3y2dx.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035150197 23628 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:43:17 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:43:17 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <ding-request@ifi.uio.no>
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2])
	by deanna.miranova.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id QAA21462
	for <steve@miranova.com>; Wed, 19 Mar 1997 16:02:23 -0800
Original-Received: from londo.prescienttech.com (londo.prescienttech.com [199.103.216.62]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <AAA20706@ifi.uio.no> for <ding@ifi.uio.no> ; Thu, 20 Mar 1997 00:49:26 +0100
Original-Received: from gkar.asds.com (gkar.asds.com [111.17.19.1])
          by londo.prescienttech.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP
	  id SAA25893 for <ding@ifi.uio.no>; Wed, 19 Mar 1997 18:49:25 -0500
Original-Received: from peorth.gweep.net (peorth.asds.com [111.17.16.8])
          by gkar.asds.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP
	  id SAA03349 for <ding@ifi.uio.no>; Wed, 19 Mar 1997 18:49:24 -0500
Original-To: "(ding)" <ding@ifi.uio.no>
X-Attribution: Rat
In-Reply-To: Steven L Baur's message of 19 Mar 1997 13:53:46 -0800
Original-Lines: 30
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.25/Emacs 19.34
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:10304
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:10304

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

>>>>> "sb" == Steven L Baur <steve@miranova.com> writes:

sb> I get this bytecompiling with XEmacs 19.14, 20.1 *and* Emacs 19.34.
sb> Something looks very fishy.

Funny, both work fine on my machine.  Might be MS-DOSly newline screwups,
though.  I'll send new copies off to Lars post haste.

sb> In addition, with md5.el I see:
sb>   ** subr md5 being redefined as a function

md5.el does not need to be used with XEmacs since XEmacs already has it
defined as a built-in function.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3
Charset: cp850

iQCVAwUBMzB4B56VRH7BJMxHAQFuFQP6A1nSRSo70ICjILSVSUpjwJE85zg3y4n+
CSFl3Tb7ZkUjEP6k7Dehbos+bP+/20IXifMV4w2VXKVdCL0NmUzOEp8J2iMcq05t
1OQhMvJ5tnKW61atB2sV8bfPQFn5MvNum+g4CwapV65hJKDfwH6s7ymEKC5hAhkS
288klWaNqTA=
=Aij5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- 
Rat <ratinox@peorth.gweep.net>    \ If Happy Fun Ball begins to smoke, get
PGP Key: at a key server near you! \ away immediately. Seek shelter and cover
                                    \ head.