Re: Checking `Reply-To'

[Stainless Steel Rat <ratinox@peorth.gweep.net>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

>>>>> "Hrv" == Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr> writes:

Hrv> Regardless of GNKSA, I think Gnus should perform the same checks for
Hrv> `Reply-To' as it does for `From'.  What do you think?

I think this is a violation of RFC822, actually.  It depends on just what
kinds of checking Gnus performs.  A common use of Reply-To (and one of the
intents of RFC822) is to specify a gatewayed mailbox that will work when
the conventional "user@domain" format will fail.  Such addresses have
potentially infinite chance to fail the tests for an Internet "user@domain"
address because most are completely different, and many are technically
illlegal.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3
Charset: cp850

iQCVAwUBMw+yA56VRH7BJMxHAQFsVQP/eil4uzxCrsRx2UYbPr/7ZDcMrNmMv1nf
3N2aUr5kaL4ywItM9JtXwuuJhGC5dJdjbW/6Rh9dDqUh3QKMbSPQqBl75qDji0kN
RR4Gbv07MYZc0SdtTAL12iuVGz8Jr3zemnCIAayEoJUi98F3qrMkjnMLjhKCzxoc
iQAuIKEAzZY=
=B1at
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- 
Rat <ratinox@peorth.gweep.net>    \ When not in use, Happy Fun Ball should be
PGP Key: at a key server near you! \ returned to its special container and
                                    \ kept under refrigeration.