From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/22410 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Robert Bihlmeyer Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Gnus *does* inline attachments Date: 12 Apr 1999 15:35:41 +0200 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035160335 29175 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 00:32:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 00:32:15 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from farabi.math.uh.edu (farabi.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.57]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA16126 for ; Mon, 12 Apr 1999 11:22:05 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by farabi.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id KAB29375; Mon, 12 Apr 1999 10:18:00 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Mon, 12 Apr 1999 10:18:09 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id KAA22179 for ; Mon, 12 Apr 1999 10:18:01 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from relay8.Austria.EU.net (relay8.Austria.EU.net [193.154.160.146]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA16039 for ; Mon, 12 Apr 1999 11:17:45 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: (from uucp@localhost) by relay8.Austria.EU.net (8.9.1/8.9.1) with UUCP id RAA18984 for ding@gnus.org; Mon, 12 Apr 1999 17:10:33 +0200 (MET DST) Original-Received: (qmail 2347 invoked by uid 115); 12 Apr 1999 13:35:42 -0000 Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Attribution: Robbe Original-Lines: 20 User-Agent: Gnus/5.07008 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.80) XEmacs/20.4 (Emerald) Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:22410 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:22410 Hi, following up to the Content-Disposition discussions: Gnus does inline mime-parts that have "Content-Disposition: attachment", if they are of type "text/plain" (maybe other types, too). It does not for "application/octet-stream". This is quite inconvenient if the mail partner knows what she's doing and uses a mail agent that does the right thing (a rare event, I'll admit). I think no attachments should be inlined by default. A toggle that inlines all attachments (for broken mail) would be fine, too. Robbe -- Robert Bihlmeyer reads: Deutsch, English, MIME, Latin-1, NO SPAM!