From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/8585 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kai Grossjohann Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: writable NNTP server -- the saga continues Date: 04 Nov 1996 16:04:29 +0100 Sender: grossjoh@charly.informatik.uni-dortmund.de Message-ID: Reply-To: Kai Grossjohann NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035148731 13031 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:18:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:18:51 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 27653 invoked from smtpd); 4 Nov 1996 15:50:18 -0000 Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@129.240.64.2) by deanna.miranova.com with SMTP; 4 Nov 1996 15:50:17 -0000 Original-Received: from fbi-mail.informatik.uni-dortmund.de (fbi-mail.informatik.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.4.42]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Mon, 4 Nov 1996 16:04:44 +0100 Original-Received: from lucy.informatik.uni-dortmund.de (lucy.informatik.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.20.160]) by fbi-mail.informatik.uni-dortmund.de (8.8.2/) with SMTP id QAA02819 for ; Mon, 4 Nov 1996 16:04:32 +0100 (MET) Original-Received: by lucy.informatik.uni-dortmund.de id QAA11120; Mon, 4 Nov 1996 16:04:31 +0100 Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no Original-Lines: 24 X-Mailer: Red Gnus v0.52/Emacs 19.31 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:8585 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:8585 Hi there, I've been hacking the expiring articles stuff. This seems to work OK, but Gnus doesn't think an article has been deleted. To clarify: let's say I move 5 articles from group A to group B. Then Gnus will tell me that it's moving all these articles, and it will also tell me for each article that it's deleting them (as it should). The NNTP server log tells me that there has been an XDELETE command for each article, all of which were completed successfully. Also, the nnmk-request-expire-articles function returns nil (no articles were not deleted -- this _is_ the meaning of the return value of *-request-expire-articles, isn't it?). Usually, after moving articles from a group, the mark changes to "G", but with my implementation the mark doesn't change (it remains "!" or "r" or "R" or whatever it was before). What did I do wrong? tia, kai -- Life is hard and then you die. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/8587 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Brian Oneill Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: fonts, why the hell do they hate me Date: 04 Nov 1996 11:11:05 -0600 Organization: Member Services International Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035148733 13040 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:18:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:18:53 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 28716 invoked from smtpd); 4 Nov 1996 17:54:00 -0000 Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@129.240.64.2) by deanna.miranova.com with SMTP; 4 Nov 1996 17:54:00 -0000 Original-Received: from mailhub.member.com ([206.10.146.130]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Mon, 4 Nov 1996 18:14:36 +0100 Original-Received: from yoda.member.com by mailhub.member.com (8.8.2/SMI-4.1.R930813) id LAA01049; Mon, 4 Nov 1996 11:13:30 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: (from btoneill@localhost) by yoda.member.com (8.8.2/8.7.3) id LAA12133; Mon, 4 Nov 1996 11:11:06 -0600 (CST) Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no X-URL: Brians Home X-Spook: Mossad Saddam Hussein colonel arrangements X-whee: That large right-to-lifers fixed politicians sloppily X-NSA-Fodder: Ft. Bragg Nazi Kennedy Cocaine In-Reply-To: Kai Grossjohann's message of 04 Nov 1996 16:04:29 +0100 Original-Lines: 22 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:8587 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:8587 Ok, i'm not sure if this is more of an xemacs question of a gnus question. But I think it's gnus. My fonts that are used in my mail headers are screwy. They are bigger then they used to be. I tried to fix them using Edit-Faces, it that works, for the current session, then when I restart, bam, back to the way that they used to be. This problem only seems to be attacking my gnus fonts. Is it that Edit-Faces while in gnus won't keep changes to gnus fonts? Do I need to edit faces while i'm not in gnus? Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance, Brian ps. yay! .sig goes in automactially again, and no more annoying mime edit mode. -- ============================================================================== /\ /\ | Brian O'Neill - Systems Programmer /\\ \\ \ M E M B E R S E R V I C E S | \/ \/ \/ ____________________________ | "the only antidote to sleeplessness /\ /\ /\ i n t e r n a t i o n a l | is..... sleep" \// // / | \/ \/ http://www.member.com | b t o n e i l l @ m e m b e r . c o m ============================================================================== From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/8592 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: writable NNTP server -- the saga continues Date: 05 Nov 1996 03:31:53 +0100 Sender: larsi@proletcult.eyesore.no Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035148736 13067 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:18:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:18:56 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 3799 invoked from smtpd); 5 Nov 1996 05:35:04 -0000 Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@129.240.64.2) by deanna.miranova.com with SMTP; 5 Nov 1996 05:35:03 -0000 Original-Received: from proletcult (root@ppp14.larris.ifi.uio.no [129.240.68.114]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Tue, 5 Nov 1996 06:18:50 +0100 Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost) by proletcult (8.8.2/8.8.2) id DAA03996; Tue, 5 Nov 1996 03:32:55 +0100 Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no In-Reply-To: Kai Grossjohann's message of 04 Nov 1996 16:04:29 +0100 Original-Lines: 19 X-Mailer: Red Gnus v0.54/Emacs 19.34 X-Face: &w!^oO~dS|}-P0~ge{$c!h\ writes: > To clarify: let's say I move 5 articles from group A to group B. Then > Gnus will tell me that it's moving all these articles, and it will > also tell me for each article that it's deleting them (as it should). > The NNTP server log tells me that there has been an XDELETE command > for each article, all of which were completed successfully. Also, the > nnmk-request-expire-articles function returns nil (no articles were > not deleted -- this _is_ the meaning of the return value of > *-request-expire-articles, isn't it?). Yes, but that's not the function that's called when moving articles. `nnmk-request-move-article' is the one that's called, and it should return a `(group . article)' cons cell that says what the group name and article number the article was moved to. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) larsi@ifi.uio.no * Lars Ingebrigtsen From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/8594 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kai Grossjohann Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: writable NNTP server -- the saga continues Date: 05 Nov 1996 13:26:37 +0100 Sender: grossjoh@charly.informatik.uni-dortmund.de Message-ID: References: Reply-To: Kai Grossjohann NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035148738 13077 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:18:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:18:58 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@ifi.uio.no Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 4541 invoked from smtpd); 5 Nov 1996 13:42:54 -0000 Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@129.240.64.2) by deanna.miranova.com with SMTP; 5 Nov 1996 13:42:50 -0000 Original-Received: from fbi-mail.informatik.uni-dortmund.de (fbi-mail.informatik.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.4.42]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id ; Tue, 5 Nov 1996 13:27:38 +0100 Original-Received: from lucy.informatik.uni-dortmund.de (lucy.informatik.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.20.160]) by fbi-mail.informatik.uni-dortmund.de (8.8.2/) with SMTP id NAA17080; Tue, 5 Nov 1996 13:26:40 +0100 (MET) Original-Received: by lucy.informatik.uni-dortmund.de id NAA04290; Tue, 5 Nov 1996 13:26:40 +0100 Original-To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen In-Reply-To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of 05 Nov 1996 03:31:53 +0100 Original-Lines: 25 X-Mailer: Red Gnus v0.52/Emacs 19.31 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:8594 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:8594 >>>>> Kai Grossjohann >>>>> writes: Kai> [...] Also, the nnmk-request-expire-articles function returns Kai> nil (no articles were not deleted -- this _is_ the meaning of Kai> the return value of *-request-expire-articles, isn't it?). >>>>> Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: Lars> Yes, but that's not the function that's called when moving Lars> articles. `nnmk-request-move-article' is the one that's Lars> called, and it should return a `(group . article)' cons cell Lars> that says what the group name and article number the article Lars> was moved to. Oops, my nnmk-request-move-article evals accept-form and deletes the article if non-nil (using nnmk-request-expire-articles). The return value of nnmk-request-move-article is the result of evaling accept-form. I see now that this is all wrong. Sorry. Going back to hacking... kai -- Life is hard and then you die. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/8595 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kai Grossjohann Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: writable NNTP server -- the saga continues Date: 05 Nov 1996 16:00:57 +0100 Sender: grossjoh@charly.informatik.uni-dortmund.de Message-ID: References: Reply-To: Kai Grossjohann NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035148739 13079 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:18:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:18:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@ifi.uio.no Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 4933 invoked from smtpd); 5 Nov 1996 15:46:44 -0000 Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@129.240.64.2) by deanna.miranova.com with SMTP; 5 Nov 1996 15:46:43 -0000 Original-Received: from fbi-mail.informatik.uni-dortmund.de (fbi-mail.informatik.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.4.42]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id ; Tue, 5 Nov 1996 16:01:36 +0100 Original-Received: from lucy.informatik.uni-dortmund.de (lucy.informatik.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.20.160]) by fbi-mail.informatik.uni-dortmund.de (8.8.2/) with SMTP id QAA19698; Tue, 5 Nov 1996 16:00:59 +0100 (MET) Original-Received: by lucy.informatik.uni-dortmund.de id QAA08204; Tue, 5 Nov 1996 16:00:58 +0100 Original-To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen In-Reply-To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of 05 Nov 1996 03:31:53 +0100 Original-Lines: 11 X-Mailer: Red Gnus v0.52/Emacs 19.31 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:8595 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:8595 >>>>> Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: Lars> `nnmk-request-move-article' is the one that's called, and it should Lars> return a `(group . article)' cons cell that says what the group name Lars> and article number the article was moved to. I returned `(article . group)'. Silly me :-( Fixed. kai -- Life is hard and then you die.