From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/9008 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Mark Boyns Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Danger! Danger! Date: 26 Nov 1996 21:54:42 -0800 Sender: boyns@doctor.sdsu.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035149099 15933 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:24:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:24:59 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 11522 invoked from smtpd); 27 Nov 1996 06:09:21 -0000 Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@129.240.64.2) by deanna.miranova.com with SMTP; 27 Nov 1996 06:09:09 -0000 Original-Received: from doctor.sdsu.edu (107@doctor.sdsu.edu [130.191.13.1]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Wed, 27 Nov 1996 06:54:48 +0100 Original-Received: (from boyns@localhost) by doctor.sdsu.edu (8.8.3/8.8.3) id VAA02136; Tue, 26 Nov 1996 21:54:43 -0800 (PST) X-URL: http://www.sdsu.edu/~boyns/ Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no In-Reply-To: David Moore's message of 26 Nov 1996 19:07:31 -0800 Original-Lines: 18 X-Mailer: Red Gnus v0.70/Emacs 19.34 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9008 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9008 David Moore writes: > I file my detected duplicates into a folder that I clear > manually, currently. What happens is that if I gcc myself and also get > a copy, that often now, the real copy will arrive via email and be filed > into the correct group (ie, not the duplicate group), but will have the > read mark set (or something). Maybe I can see if I can make this > reproducable. I think I noticed this problem yesterday. I sent a message to myself and Gcc it to nnml:mail.boyns. (which is where the sent message will also go) When I type M-g on nnml:mail.boyns, the message I sent to myself is read from the spool and the group buffer says there are 2 new messages. When I enter nnml:mail.boyns only 1 article is displayed. This is reproducible.