From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/6182 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Mark Boyns Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: unticking ticked articles in nnml groups Date: 08 May 1996 12:43:43 -0700 Sender: boyns@sdsu.edu Message-ID: References: <199605081833.MAA06505@roberts.cdc.noaa.gov> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035146675 2796 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:44:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:44:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Ding Gnus List Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id NAA06640 for ; Wed, 8 May 1996 13:19:13 -0700 Original-Received: from doctor.sdsu.edu (doctor.sdsu.edu [130.191.13.1]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Wed, 8 May 1996 21:43:58 +0200 Original-Received: (from boyns@localhost) by doctor.sdsu.edu (8.7.4/8.7.3) id MAA06973; Wed, 8 May 1996 12:43:44 -0700 (PDT) Original-To: Mark Borges In-Reply-To: Mark Borges's message of Wed, 8 May 1996 12:33:37 -0600 Original-Lines: 15 X-Mailer: September Gnus v0.83/Emacs 19.30 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:6182 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:6182 Mark Borges writes: [snip] > What do others think? Is the current behavior the desired one? If so, > is there some option (or group of options) that will give me my > desired behavior? Right now I go back and change all the `O' marks to > `E' so that the articles will eventually get deleted, but I'm getting > tired of doing that. I bet there is a better way in sgnus to get done > what I want. `C-k' (gnus-summary-kill-same-subject) does what you want, but I do think that `d' should mark them expireable. -- Mark Boyns PGP fingerprint = D3 28 A2 F7 D1 4C F8 EE BF 7A 11 54 1C E5 6E CC