From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/7758
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Jens Lautenbacher <jens@lemming0.lem.uni-karlsruhe.de>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Different "Re:" Styles
Date: 30 Aug 1996 01:18:28 +0200
Message-ID: <x2vie1u6d7.fsf@lemming0.lem.uni-karlsruhe.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.77)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035148028 8448 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:07:08 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:07:08 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id QAA06348 for <steve@miranova.com>; Thu, 29 Aug 1996 16:37:17 -0700
Original-Received: from lemming0.lem.uni-karlsruhe.de (jens@lemming0.lem.uni-karlsruhe.de [129.13.103.195]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <BAA27058@ifi.uio.no> for <ding@ifi.uio.no> ; Fri, 30 Aug 1996 01:18:55 +0200
Original-Received: (from jens@localhost) by lemming0.lem.uni-karlsruhe.de (8.6.12/8.6.9) id BAA18972; Fri, 30 Aug 1996 01:18:28 +0200
Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no
X-Face: Z[@OB)("ZvE?ev~1b+b!0ZUB.$%rh.9qE>dVf>q}Q/V?%d`J3gd!LR\aAZ8<Hwi]xTA(:*c
 ;i3,?K?+rCy*^b$)a,}E?eo},}x2]5LlJysyoUOK"o[>K)'\Ulb7y-7*.If^;rHl['oa)n_M7E6w+L
 DKMs"G8_`c)uOS1^}.1|8Ill]7X68X-paeUOpBhz<F`B0?~^2Et~GYfw~/0]H]nx4~C_E/_mp#^7Ix
 c:
Original-Lines: 14
X-Mailer: Red Gnus v0.19/XEmacs 19.14
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:7758
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:7758



I have often discussion with someone who has a mailer that marks
Replies with "Aw:" instead of "Re:". The net result is that gnus is no
longer able to thread the posting-answer-backanswer-.... chain and
message produces "Re: Aw: blabla" for my answers on his first answer. 

Is there any possibility to tune gnus in a way that it is able to
process "Aw:" at the beginning og a subject line the same way ot does
for "Re:" ?????

Yours,
	Jens