From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/8009
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@ifi.uio.no>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: discouraging use of `Re: none' subject
Date: 24 Sep 1996 19:57:15 +0200
Message-ID: <x620frdcec.fsf@eyesore.no>
References: <wpgn2yhm6he.fsf_-_@asic.sc.ti.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035148242 9659 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:10:42 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:10:42 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.7.6/8.6.9) with SMTP id LAA00826 for <steve@miranova.com>; Tue, 24 Sep 1996 11:53:07 -0700
Original-Received: from ylfing.ifi.uio.no (ylfing.ifi.uio.no [129.240.94.25]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <UAA27087@ifi.uio.no> for <ding@ifi.uio.no> ; Tue, 24 Sep 1996 20:24:41 +0200
Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost) by ylfing.ifi.uio.no ; Tue, 24 Sep 1996 20:24:37 +0200
Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no
In-Reply-To: Jim Meyering's message of 23 Sep 1996 13:27:57 -0500
Original-Lines: 14
X-Mailer: Red Gnus v0.42/Emacs 19.29
X-Face: &w!^oO<W.WBH]FsTP:P0f9X6M-ygaADlA_)eF$<UwQzj7:C=Gi<a?/_4$LX^@$Qq7-O&XHp
 lDARi8e8iT<(A$LWAZD*xjk^')/wI5nG;1cNB>~dS|}-P0~ge{$c!h\<y
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:8009
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:8009

Jim Meyering <meyering@asic.sc.ti.com> writes:

> I just replied to a message with no subject (or maybe it really was `none')
> and neglected to edit the zero-content Subject: field.
> 
> It would be nice if Gnus warned about that, just as it does
> when I leave Subject: blank.

Hm.  I don't know.  If you're responding to a message with no subject,
I think a "Re: none" subject is appropriate.

-- 
  "Yes.  The journey through the human heart 
     would have to wait until some other time."