From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/6399
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@ifi.uio.no>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Gnus v5.2 is released
Date: 27 May 1996 03:55:21 +0200
Message-ID: <x620k6c22e.fsf@eyesore.no>
References: <w8s3f4nnj5q.fsf@eistla.ifi.uio.no>
	<m2pw7q7vtc.fsf@deanna.miranova.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035146860 3477 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:47:40 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:47:40 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id TAA10341 for <steve@miranova.com>; Sun, 26 May 1996 19:16:47 -0700
Original-Received: from eistla.ifi.uio.no (4867@eistla.ifi.uio.no [129.240.94.29]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <DAA02426@ifi.uio.no> for <ding@ifi.uio.no> ; Mon, 27 May 1996 03:59:32 +0200
Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost) by eistla.ifi.uio.no ; Mon, 27 May 1996 03:59:31 +0200
Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no
In-Reply-To: Steven L Baur's message of 26 May 1996 18:23:59 -0700
Original-Lines: 16
X-Mailer: September Gnus v0.97/Emacs 19.29
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:6399
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:6399

Steven L Baur <steve@miranova.com> writes:

> What's the difference between Sgnus 0.97 and Gnus 5.2.0 & Gnus 5.2.1?

The names?  :-)

> -rw-r--r--  1 larsi       633523 May 26 22:45 sgnus-0.97.tar.gz
> -rw-r--r--  1 larsi       633518 May 26 22:54 gnus-5.2.0.tar.gz
> -rw-r--r--  1 larsi       637552 May 26 23:01 gnus-5.2.1.tar.gz

5.2.0 and 0.97 are identical; 5.2.1 includes the etc/gnus-tut.txt
file but is otherwise the same as the other two.

-- 
  "Yes.  The journey through the human heart 
     would have to wait until some other time."