From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@ifi.uio.no>
Subject: Re: What is better for splitting: complex regexp or many rules
Date: 25 Oct 1996 08:56:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <x63ez3jx4e.fsf@eyesore.no> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Kees de Bruin's message of 24 Oct 1996 08:49:49 +0200
Kees de Bruin <kees_de_bruin@tasking.nl> writes:
> I have a list of people I receive e-mail from and I would like to know what
> is better: have a split entry for each person or create a complex regular
> expression that matches all the e-mail addresses? The number of people
> range from between 5 and 40 for a single split.
I don't think it matters much. Do whatever feels most comfortable to
you.
--
"Yes. The journey through the human heart
would have to wait until some other time."
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1996-10-25 7:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1996-10-24 6:49 Kees de Bruin
1996-10-25 7:56 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen [this message]
1996-10-28 23:52 ` Danny Siu
1996-10-29 9:35 ` Per Abrahamsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=x63ez3jx4e.fsf@eyesore.no \
--to=larsi@ifi.uio.no \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).