From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/5494 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: larsi@ifi.uio.no (Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Sorting summary - cached articles Date: 09 Mar 1996 23:56:46 +0100 Organization: Dept. of Informatics, University of Oslo, Norway Sender: larsi@ifi.uio.no Message-ID: References: <9603082052.AA29818@cheux.ecs.umass.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035146090 508 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:34:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:34:50 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.7.3/8.6.9) with SMTP id PAA24194 for ; Sat, 9 Mar 1996 15:29:53 -0800 Original-Received: from eistla.ifi.uio.no (4867@eistla.ifi.uio.no [129.240.94.29]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Sat, 9 Mar 1996 23:56:47 +0100 Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost) by eistla.ifi.uio.no ; Sat, 9 Mar 1996 23:56:46 +0100 Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no In-Reply-To: Jack Vinson's message of Fri, 8 Mar 1996 15:52:09 -0500 Original-Lines: 18 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:5494 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:5494 Jack Vinson writes: > Should cached articles get sorted along with all the rest of them? Yes. > Why doesn't this happen all the time? I've got some groups where > the cached articles stay at the top and others where the article > gets sorted into the rest of the articles. I haven't seen this... Cached articles should be handled just like any other articles. Perhaps the effect you're seeing is just that the cached articles have so much lower article numbers than the uncached ones? -- "Yes. The journey through the human heart would have to wait until some other time."