From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/6476 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Blue (or was it yellow?) GNUS suggestions Date: 31 May 1996 09:28:28 +0200 Message-ID: References: <199605252131.RAA00636@atreides> <199605280045.UAA00274@atreides> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035146925 3697 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:48:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:48:45 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id BAA22241 for ; Fri, 31 May 1996 01:26:20 -0700 Original-Received: from eistla.ifi.uio.no (4867@eistla.ifi.uio.no [129.240.94.29]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Fri, 31 May 1996 09:46:22 +0200 Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost) by eistla.ifi.uio.no ; Fri, 31 May 1996 09:46:20 +0200 Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no In-Reply-To: "Sudish Joseph"'s message of 28 May 1996 18:59:01 -0400 Original-Lines: 16 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.2.5/Emacs 19.29 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:6476 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:6476 "Sudish Joseph" writes: > IMO, it'd be a big win if GNUS went ahead and prepared the summary > for the headers it already has, thus distributing the cost of > summary generation over the time wasted waiting for all headers. Yeah, that would be ultra-kool. Hm. One could do this sort of thing without having an external threader type thing as well. But one would have to write the thing in C. Updating/removing/inserting things in this manner in Elisp would just be far too slow. But it would be seriously cool. -- "Yes. The journey through the human heart would have to wait until some other time."