From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/6406 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Gnus v5.2 is released Date: 28 May 1996 00:44:28 +0200 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035146866 3496 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:47:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:47:46 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id QAA02828 for ; Mon, 27 May 1996 16:20:58 -0700 Original-Received: from eistla.ifi.uio.no (4867@eistla.ifi.uio.no [129.240.94.29]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Tue, 28 May 1996 01:01:12 +0200 Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost) by eistla.ifi.uio.no ; Tue, 28 May 1996 01:01:07 +0200 Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no In-Reply-To: Steven L Baur's message of 26 May 1996 19:50:57 -0700 Original-Lines: 34 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.2.2/Emacs 19.29 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:6406 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:6406 Steven L Baur writes: > Could you separate out the Gnus version number from the rest of the > string: > "Gnus v5.2.1" > Eg. Pull out the 5.2.1 (or whatever) into a separate variable? I suppose. But shouldn't the alpha prefixes fit into the scheme? `gnus-continuum-version' takes a Gnus version string and returns a floating point number. September is greater than 5.1, and 5.2 is greater than September, and Red is greater than 5.2, etc. (This function is broken in 5.2.1, by the way.) > (Or > even something akin to emacs-major-version & emacs-minor-version). > I'd like to be able to do things like: > (concat "/usr/local/lib/xemacs/gnus-" gnus-version-number "/") > or is there already a better way to do this? Ok, I'll do this in 5.2.2. > Also, once we move on into Red Gnus, will you reset the version > numbering to 0 again, or use the Linux convention of even number > stable, odd number development? Going to Red Gnus 5.3 might help > reduce some confusion. And it might not, but it's worth asking. I guess there will be a Gnus 5.2.0-5.2.15, and then I'll go to Gnus 5.3 for Emacs 19.32. Red Gnus will end up as 5.4 & 5.5, I guess. (But the alphas will be "Red Gnus v0.1", etc., as with (ding) and September.) -- "Yes. The journey through the human heart would have to wait until some other time."