From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/6223 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: multiple .signatures possible Date: 17 May 1996 06:31:41 +0200 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035146709 2950 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:45:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:45:09 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id WAA31030 for ; Thu, 16 May 1996 22:33:25 -0700 Original-Received: from eistla.ifi.uio.no (4867@eistla.ifi.uio.no [129.240.94.29]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Fri, 17 May 1996 07:04:23 +0200 Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost) by eistla.ifi.uio.no ; Fri, 17 May 1996 07:04:22 +0200 Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no In-Reply-To: Sten Drescher's message of 16 May 1996 19:32:40 -0500 Original-Lines: 13 X-Mailer: September Gnus v0.87/Emacs 19.29 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:6223 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:6223 Sten Drescher writes: > But that makes it put in the string (appropriately). I've > tried using the same thing for message-signature-file, but that blows > up. In what way does it blow up? The right thing to do there is to set `message-signature' to t and `message-signature-file' to whatever signature file you like. -- "Yes. The journey through the human heart would have to wait until some other time."