From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/6299 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Picons oddities Date: 21 May 1996 12:17:56 +0200 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035146776 3241 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:46:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:46:16 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id JAA21172 for ; Tue, 21 May 1996 09:53:34 -0700 Original-Received: from ylfing.ifi.uio.no (4867@ylfing.ifi.uio.no [129.240.94.25]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Tue, 21 May 1996 18:07:52 +0200 Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost) by ylfing.ifi.uio.no ; Tue, 21 May 1996 18:07:51 +0200 Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no In-Reply-To: Steven L Baur's message of 20 May 1996 12:54:01 -0700 Original-Lines: 25 X-Mailer: September Gnus v0.90/Emacs 19.29 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:6299 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:6299 Steven L Baur writes: > Following the ``Simple''instructions in the manual results in a > little frame being overlayed on the upper right corner of the primary > Gnus frame. The *Picons* frame is large enough to be larger than the > *Summary* buffer, and since it is right aligned (as good a place as > any) it totally obscures the scrollbar when the scrollbar is on the > right. This is not a good default -- the frame should be moved enough > pixels to the left to let the Scrollbar be visible. Well, the spec is just: (vertical ((height . 5) (width . 15) (user-position . t) (left . -1) (top . 1)) The position and size of any other frames isn't taken into consideration at all. Perhaps the frame should be given a name like "Picons" and then the position could be overridden by the X resources or something? Or is `user-position' given higher priority than the resources? Hm. Probably. -- "Yes. The journey through the human heart would have to wait until some other time."