From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/6189 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: [sgnus v0.83] Followup Subject: typos in message.el (patch) Date: 09 May 1996 23:58:34 +0200 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035146681 2816 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:44:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:44:41 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id SAA24090 for ; Thu, 9 May 1996 18:35:53 -0700 Original-Received: from aegir.ifi.uio.no (4867@aegir.ifi.uio.no [129.240.94.24]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Fri, 10 May 1996 03:16:08 +0200 Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost) by aegir.ifi.uio.no ; Fri, 10 May 1996 03:16:06 +0200 Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no In-Reply-To: Steven L Baur's message of 09 May 1996 11:21:15 -0700 Original-Lines: 15 X-Mailer: September Gnus v0.84/Emacs 19.29 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:6189 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:6189 Steven L Baur writes: > Shouldn't the two regular expressions corrected here, also be extended > to match Re[2]: etc.? There are apparently new mail programs > generating these kind of (broken) followup subjects. The GNKSA doesn't allow rewriting Subject headers in that manner. > Also, I'd like to not see the braindamaged ``-reply'', ever. When do you see that? -- "Yes. The journey through the human heart would have to wait until some other time."