From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/5583 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: larsi@ifi.uio.no (Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: "evil" nntp Date: 18 Mar 1996 23:10:41 +0100 Organization: Dept. of Informatics, University of Oslo, Norway Sender: larsi@ifi.uio.no Message-ID: References: <199603181920.WAA11231@mangal.cs.huji.ac.il> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035146166 786 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:36:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:36:06 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.7.3/8.6.9) with SMTP id OAA14307 for ; Mon, 18 Mar 1996 14:54:29 -0800 Original-Received: from eistla.ifi.uio.no (4867@eistla.ifi.uio.no [129.240.94.29]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Mon, 18 Mar 1996 23:10:42 +0100 Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost) by eistla.ifi.uio.no ; Mon, 18 Mar 1996 23:10:42 +0100 Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no In-Reply-To: Yair Friedman's message of Mon, 18 Mar 96 22:20:24 +0300 Original-Lines: 14 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:5583 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:5583 Yair Friedman writes: > Does anyone has experience with setting nntp-nov-is-evil to t? What > exactly will I gain or lose by setting this variable? Group entry will be sloooow. Emacs will grow more than usual. People only use that variable when the NOV files don't contain the Xref header. If that's the case, you'll get better crosspost handling if you set that variable. -- "Yes. The journey through the human heart would have to wait until some other time."