From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/5498 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: larsi@ifi.uio.no (Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: caching articles in a digest group? Date: 11 Mar 1996 04:56:36 +0000 Organization: Dept. of Informatics, University of Oslo, Norway Sender: larsi@ifi.uio.no Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035146094 516 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:34:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:34:54 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.7.3/8.6.9) with SMTP id VAA16429 for ; Sun, 10 Mar 1996 21:31:23 -0800 Original-Received: from eistla.ifi.uio.no (4867@eistla.ifi.uio.no [129.240.94.29]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Mon, 11 Mar 1996 05:56:38 +0100 Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost) by eistla.ifi.uio.no ; Mon, 11 Mar 1996 05:56:37 +0100 Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no In-Reply-To: gsstark@MIT.EDU's message of 10 Mar 1996 17:10:23 -0500 Original-Lines: 23 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:5498 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:5498 gsstark@MIT.EDU (Greg Stark) writes: > So I just hit * on an article in a digest group, ding happily cached > it in a directory called nndoc:comp.risks-1180 which, near as i can > tell it never uses later. I'm not sure what should happen here, but > it probably shouldn't let me gobble up disk quota for no purpose. Who are we to second-guess what people want to do? Users may want to do something like that, and then use a cache server to browse all the various cache groups, silly or not. > I suspect the Right Thing probably involves the thing we've been > discussing that would allow following threads through multiple > digests. I think this demonstrates a new requirement of any solution > to that problem: it should be possible to save old articles from old > digests and have them be threaded properly with the new articles. Hmn. Well, I don't quite see how to incorporate cached articles from some digests into the collections of nndoc groups... -- "Yes. The journey through the human heart would have to wait until some other time."