From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/6199 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: [sgnus v0.83] Followup Subject: typos in message.el (patch) Date: 11 May 1996 02:37:06 +0200 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035146689 2847 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:44:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:44:49 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id UAA04456 for ; Mon, 13 May 1996 20:56:52 -0700 Original-Received: from eistla.ifi.uio.no (4867@eistla.ifi.uio.no [129.240.94.29]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Tue, 14 May 1996 04:27:17 +0200 Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost) by eistla.ifi.uio.no ; Tue, 14 May 1996 04:27:16 +0200 Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no In-Reply-To: Steven L Baur's message of 09 May 1996 20:29:15 -0700 Original-Lines: 16 X-Mailer: September Gnus v0.84/Emacs 19.29 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:6199 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:6199 Steven L Baur writes: > If this Subject: were instead: > Subject: Re: Re[2]: Re^3: [hwg-main] Web site -Reply -Reply -Reply > > What would the harm be in Gnus rewriting the header as: > Subject: Re: [hwg-main] Web site That would violate the GNKSA. Even if that were not the case, rewriting subject headers will break threading (and stuff) on some newsreaders. For instance, I think tin (which is unthreaded) will be confused by rewriting. (It will break the thread into two "threads".) -- "Yes. The journey through the human heart would have to wait until some other time."