From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/8458
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@ifi.uio.no>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: mailto:address?subject=subject URL support
Date: 22 Oct 1996 01:37:13 +0100
Message-ID: <x6vic3bzra.fsf@eyesore.no>
References: <rjzq1gcw53.fsf@kolmogorov.dina.kvl.dk> 	<199610021459.HAA00395@newman.in.aventail.com> <wh4tjounnd.fsf@norne.metis.no>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035148616 12233 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:16:56 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:16:56 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <ding-request@ifi.uio.no>
Original-Received: (qmail 17195 invoked from smtpd); 22 Oct 1996 01:46:38 -0000
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@129.240.64.2)
  by deanna.miranova.com with SMTP; 22 Oct 1996 01:46:37 -0000
Original-Received: from ylfing.ifi.uio.no (ylfing.ifi.uio.no [129.240.94.25]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <DAA07216@ifi.uio.no> for <ding@ifi.uio.no> ; Tue, 22 Oct 1996 03:25:54 +0200
Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost) by ylfing.ifi.uio.no ; Tue, 22 Oct 1996 03:25:05 +0200
Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no
In-Reply-To: Steinar Bang's message of 21 Oct 1996 21:23:50 +0200
Original-Lines: 11
X-Mailer: Red Gnus v0.53/Emacs 19.29
X-Face: &w!^oO<W.WBH]FsTP:P0f9X6M-ygaADlA_)eF$<UwQzj7:C=Gi<a?/_4$LX^@$Qq7-O&XHp
 lDARi8e8iT<(A$LWAZD*xjk^')/wI5nG;1cNB>~dS|}-P0~ge{$c!h\<y
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:8458
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:8458

Steinar Bang <sb@metis.no> writes:

> Hum, yes.  If I remember correctly, it was never meant to be
> published.  It was just meant as a hidden implementation detail,
> because they used the same code to do several things.

So should I apply the patch or not? 

-- 
  "Yes.  The journey through the human heart 
     would have to wait until some other time."