From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/8394 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Adaptive scoring in nnml groups Date: 14 Oct 1996 21:12:25 +0100 Message-ID: References: <7waftrnxzh.fsf@lite.johnbryce.co.il> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035148560 11883 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:16:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:16:00 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 25310 invoked from smtpd); 14 Oct 1996 20:28:14 -0000 Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@129.240.64.2) by deanna.miranova.com with SMTP; 14 Oct 1996 20:28:14 -0000 Original-Received: from ylfing.ifi.uio.no (4867@ylfing.ifi.uio.no [129.240.94.25]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Mon, 14 Oct 1996 22:09:24 +0200 Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost) by ylfing.ifi.uio.no ; Mon, 14 Oct 1996 22:09:20 +0200 Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no In-Reply-To: Yair Friedman's message of 13 Oct 1996 09:07:30 +0200 Original-Lines: 13 X-Mailer: Red Gnus v0.51/Emacs 19.29 X-Face: &w!^oO~dS|}-P0~ge{$c!h\ writes: > When annotations are implemented maybe adaptive scoring could use its > own set of marks? Uhm... No, I don't think so. Those would be separate issues -- you wouldn't want to rely on being able to make annotations (which would in all likelihood be slow) to do adaptive scoring (which has to be fast). -- "Yes. The journey through the human heart would have to wait until some other time."