From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/6253 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Display glitches in sgnus 0.83 (II) Date: 19 May 1996 18:07:05 +0200 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035146735 3054 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:45:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:45:35 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id KAA18882 for ; Sun, 19 May 1996 10:11:25 -0700 Original-Received: from eistla.ifi.uio.no (4867@eistla.ifi.uio.no [129.240.94.29]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Sun, 19 May 1996 18:42:43 +0200 Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost) by eistla.ifi.uio.no ; Sun, 19 May 1996 18:42:42 +0200 Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no In-Reply-To: Steven L Baur's message of 09 May 1996 10:56:45 -0700 Original-Lines: 15 X-Mailer: September Gnus v0.89/Emacs 19.29 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:6253 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:6253 Steven L Baur writes: > Enabling gnus-article-hide-signature in the gnus-article-display-hook > is still too aggressive. It should not cross MIME multipart > boundaries. To deal with that properly, Gnus would have to do some MIME parsing, which is something I'd rather not get into. An easy hack would be to set `gnus-signature-limit' to "^--Multipart" or something -- that way signatures that contain that regexp wouldn't be hidden. Is that nice, though? -- "Yes. The journey through the human heart would have to wait until some other time."