* Kerberos functionality? @ 1997-01-22 17:09 John Twilley 1997-01-22 20:33 ` Rich Pieri 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: John Twilley @ 1997-01-22 17:09 UTC (permalink / raw) I know that APOP's being added eventually to ways-to-read-mail. WIll Kerberos ever be added? I know there was discussion of something like this in the past, but I don't know the end result. Jack. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Kerberos functionality? 1997-01-22 17:09 Kerberos functionality? John Twilley @ 1997-01-22 20:33 ` Rich Pieri 1997-01-22 21:42 ` Michael Welsh Duggan 1997-01-22 22:52 ` Ken Raeburn 0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Rich Pieri @ 1997-01-22 20:33 UTC (permalink / raw) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>>>> "JT" == John Twilley <jmt@NDA.COM> writes: JT> WIll Kerberos ever be added? If you are using a Kerberized movemail program, you have it. If you are not, you should. Implementing Kerberos authentication in Emacs-Lisp is probably unfeasable, and is a project I have no intention of tackling. This is why, when I finally get around to rewriting the relevant section of nnmail.el, I will be leaving in the capability of using an external mail program. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.3a Charset: noconv iQCVAwUBMuZ5oJ6VRH7BJMxHAQFJlgP/dmSNwSblULEdgF291uxmMY1RGG/NJxOO JN3a+CwZh6HbAqtAq0rqeSoo+dd/ZlsyBsi7IvRkGR2SF1G8QZHlgR6taGo7gevn 9Gzj3cJAjqxCGx35LeGtTny/Cp251bvOxSyEijQPULKZdVMWgn9w1gCxpr8NXZw7 677oXTuYgAY= =fkb4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Rich Pieri <rich.pieri@prescienttech.com> | Caution: Happy Fun Ball may Prescient Technologies, Inc. | suddenly accelerate to dangerous A Stone & Webster Company | speeds. I speak for myself, not PTI or SWEC | ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Kerberos functionality? 1997-01-22 20:33 ` Rich Pieri @ 1997-01-22 21:42 ` Michael Welsh Duggan 1997-01-22 22:51 ` William M. Perry 1997-01-23 0:30 ` Ken Raeburn 1997-01-22 22:52 ` Ken Raeburn 1 sibling, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Michael Welsh Duggan @ 1997-01-22 21:42 UTC (permalink / raw) Rich Pieri <rich.pieri@PrescientTech.com> writes: > If you are using a Kerberized movemail program, you have it. If you are > not, you should. Implementing Kerberos authentication in Emacs-Lisp is > probably unfeasable, and is a project I have no intention of tackling. Actually, high on my wish list is Kerberos for emacs, in the c-code, with some functions to access it. (Maybe integrated into open-network-stream.) -- Michael Duggan (md5i@schenley.com) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Kerberos functionality? 1997-01-22 21:42 ` Michael Welsh Duggan @ 1997-01-22 22:51 ` William M. Perry 1997-01-23 0:30 ` Ken Raeburn 1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: William M. Perry @ 1997-01-22 22:51 UTC (permalink / raw) Cc: ding Michael Welsh Duggan writes: >Rich Pieri <rich.pieri@PrescientTech.com> writes: > >> If you are using a Kerberized movemail program, you have it. If you are >> not, you should. Implementing Kerberos authentication in Emacs-Lisp is >> probably unfeasable, and is a project I have no intention of tackling. > >Actually, high on my wish list is Kerberos for emacs, in the c-code, >with some functions to access it. (Maybe integrated into >open-network-stream.) This wouldn't be too hard. I've had patches to do this for SSL in Emacs for about a year now (using SSLeay of course), but haven't distributed them for fear of jailtime. :) I'll have to whip them into shape next time I have some spare time. -Bill p. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Kerberos functionality? 1997-01-22 21:42 ` Michael Welsh Duggan 1997-01-22 22:51 ` William M. Perry @ 1997-01-23 0:30 ` Ken Raeburn 1997-01-23 15:02 ` William M. Perry 1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Ken Raeburn @ 1997-01-23 0:30 UTC (permalink / raw) "Michael Welsh Duggan" <md5i@schenley.com> writes: > Actually, high on my wish list is Kerberos for emacs, in the c-code, > with some functions to access it. (Maybe integrated into > open-network-stream.) Go for it! But put plenty of thought into how interrupts should be dealt with, blocking network i/o, that sort of thing. I don't think integrating into open-network-stream is the best way, though a lisp function that calls open-network-stream and then calls krb-sendauth on the subprocess object would be very useful. Of course, that still doesn't get us encryption.... ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Kerberos functionality? 1997-01-23 0:30 ` Ken Raeburn @ 1997-01-23 15:02 ` William M. Perry 0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: William M. Perry @ 1997-01-23 15:02 UTC (permalink / raw) Cc: ding Ken Raeburn writes: >"Michael Welsh Duggan" <md5i@schenley.com> writes: > >> Actually, high on my wish list is Kerberos for emacs, in the c-code, >> with some functions to access it. (Maybe integrated into >> open-network-stream.) > >Go for it! But put plenty of thought into how interrupts should be >dealt with, blocking network i/o, that sort of thing. > >I don't think integrating into open-network-stream is the best way, >though a lisp function that calls open-network-stream and then calls >krb-sendauth on the subprocess object would be very useful. > >Of course, that still doesn't get us encryption.... the way I implemented SSL was you used a normal open-network-stream to connecto to a host. Then there was a secondary call 'ssl-initialize-connection' that did all the SSL handshaking, etc, and marked the process as 'sslified'. Then the read/write routines for processes were modified to check the sslified bit, and use SSLread/SSLwrite if it was set. This turned out to be a great way to do it, because you could do all sorts of things before the SSL connection was established - netscape-style SSL proxying negotiation (which happens in the clear), still being able to use telnet in a subprocess or the 'tcp' package from the old GNUS to get outside your firewall, traversing a socks firewall, etc. It has been a _long_ time since I really looked at kerberos, but I'm sure something similar could be done. The real bitch was writing RSA certificate manipulation functions that could be exported to the lisp level. Bleah. -Bill P. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Kerberos functionality? 1997-01-22 20:33 ` Rich Pieri 1997-01-22 21:42 ` Michael Welsh Duggan @ 1997-01-22 22:52 ` Ken Raeburn 1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Ken Raeburn @ 1997-01-22 22:52 UTC (permalink / raw) Rich Pieri <rich.pieri@PrescientTech.com> writes: > >>>>> "JT" == John Twilley <jmt@NDA.COM> writes: > > JT> WIll Kerberos ever be added? > > If you are using a Kerberized movemail program, you have it. If you are > not, you should. Implementing Kerberos authentication in Emacs-Lisp is > probably unfeasable, and is a project I have no intention of tackling. Probably not even possible, unless/until emacs gives you some way of extracting both IP addresses of a net connection. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~1997-01-23 15:02 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 1997-01-22 17:09 Kerberos functionality? John Twilley 1997-01-22 20:33 ` Rich Pieri 1997-01-22 21:42 ` Michael Welsh Duggan 1997-01-22 22:51 ` William M. Perry 1997-01-23 0:30 ` Ken Raeburn 1997-01-23 15:02 ` William M. Perry 1997-01-22 22:52 ` Ken Raeburn
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).