From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/10507
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: jason@mastaler.com (Jason R. Mastaler)
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: www.emacs.org?
Date: 03 Apr 1997 15:56:49 -0500
Sender: jason@mastaler.com
Message-ID: <x77mijn7u6.fsf@mastaler.com>
References: <199704031907.OAA27218@ashanti.vcinet.com> <x7afnfnahy.fsf@mastaler.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.106)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035150366 24800 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:46:06 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:46:06 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <ding-request@ifi.uio.no>
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2])
	by deanna.miranova.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id NAA03512
	for <steve@miranova.com>; Thu, 3 Apr 1997 13:12:24 -0800
Original-Received: from claymore.vcinet.com (claymore.vcinet.com [208.205.12.23]) by ifi.uio.no with SMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <WAA19383@ifi.uio.no> for <ding@ifi.uio.no> ; Thu, 3 Apr 1997 22:56:59 +0200
Original-Received: (qmail 5343 invoked by uid 504); 3 Apr 1997 20:54:23 -0000
Original-Received: (qmail 5340 invoked from network); 3 Apr 1997 20:54:22 -0000
Original-Received: from ashanti.vcinet.com (208.205.15.58)
  by claymore.vcinet.com with SMTP; 3 Apr 1997 20:54:22 -0000
Original-Received: (from jason@localhost)
	by ashanti.vcinet.com (8.8.4/8.8.5) id PAA29266;
	Thu, 3 Apr 1997 15:56:50 -0500 (EST)
Original-To: ding@gnus.org
In-Reply-To: jason@mastaler.com's message of 03 Apr 1997 14:59:21 -0500
Original-Lines: 11
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.40/XEmacs 19.15
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:10507
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:10507

jason@mastaler.com (Jason R. Mastaler) writes:

> Simmer down sport.  I don't keep track of who is on the ding list,
> and you don't exactly contribute alot.  Besides, this discussion has
> been going on for some time now.  Maybe you should have stepped up
> earlier?  If I was really being an "asshole" about this I would have 
> included the full headers of the message you sent me including your
> e-mail address instead of making it anonymous.

Oops, I misread Brian's response.  Ignore the above paragraph.