From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/10843
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Jason R. Mastaler" <jason@mastaler.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: gnus date suggestion
Date: 02 May 1997 01:17:36 -0400
Message-ID: <x7911yo3kf.fsf@mastaler.com>
References: <x76812vhax.fsf@mastaler.com> <rvd8vah7id.fsf@sdnp5.ucsd.edu> <x7sp078e8o.fsf@mastaler.com> <rig1w6cw4k.fsf@urth.acsu.buffalo.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.106)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035150647 26736 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:50:47 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:50:47 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: "\(ding\) Gnus Mailing List" <ding@gnus.org>,
        XEmacs Beta Discussion List <xemacs-beta-discuss@xemacs.org>
Return-Path: <ding-request@ifi.uio.no>
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2])
	by deanna.miranova.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id WAA11031
	for <steve@miranova.com>; Thu, 1 May 1997 22:43:23 -0700
Original-Received: from claymore.vcinet.com (claymore.vcinet.com [208.205.12.23]) by ifi.uio.no with SMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <HAA14854@ifi.uio.no> for <ding@ifi.uio.no> ; Fri, 2 May 1997 07:17:54 +0200
Original-Received: (qmail 18067 invoked by uid 504); 2 May 1997 05:15:38 -0000
Original-Received: (qmail 18064 invoked from network); 2 May 1997 05:15:37 -0000
Original-Received: from ashanti.vcinet.com (208.205.15.58)
  by claymore.vcinet.com with SMTP; 2 May 1997 05:15:37 -0000
Original-Received: (from jason@localhost)
	by ashanti.vcinet.com (8.8.4/8.8.5) id BAA00969;
	Fri, 2 May 1997 01:17:37 -0400 (EDT)
Original-To: Paul Graham <pjg@acsu.buffalo.edu>
In-Reply-To: Paul Graham's message of 02 May 1997 00:53:47 -0400
Original-Lines: 13
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.48/XEmacs 19.15
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:10843
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:10843

Paul Graham <pjg@acsu.buffalo.edu> writes:

> since both of the are legal (by my reading of rfcs 822 and 1123) i don't
> understand the objection to the gnus format.

I don't object to the format necessarily.  I just think having the
day of the week as part of the Date header is more intuitive, and
more widely used among MUAs and newsreaders, and therefore more
preferable.

-- 
Jason R. Mastaler                                 jason@mastaler.com