From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/13119
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Jason R Mastaler <jason@4b.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: I hate MULE (and compile warnings)
Date: 02 Dec 1997 12:23:44 -0700
Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu
Message-ID: <x7afejpn0f.fsf@4b.org>
References: <19971201230320.14186.rocketmail@send1b.yahoomail.com> <wh67p8usbq.fsf@norne.troll.no> <m2iut8jbbw.fsf@altair.xemacs.org> <whsosbr9uw.fsf@norne.troll.no>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.108)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035152541 7572 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 22:22:21 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 22:22:21 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu>
Original-Received: from xemacs.org (xemacs.cs.uiuc.edu [128.174.252.16])
	by altair.xemacs.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA10994
	for <steve@altair.xemacs.org>; Tue, 2 Dec 1997 12:19:17 -0800
Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (root@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA14170
	for <steve@xemacs.org>; Tue, 2 Dec 1997 14:22:07 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id NAH09320; Tue, 2 Dec 1997 13:58:21 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Tue, 02 Dec 1997 13:57:45 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: from claymore.vcinet.com (claymore.vcinet.com [208.205.12.23]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id NAA09307 for <ding@hpc.uh.edu>; Tue, 2 Dec 1997 13:57:37 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: (qmail 21124 invoked by uid 504); 2 Dec 1997 19:57:26 -0000
Original-Received: (qmail 21121 invoked from network); 2 Dec 1997 19:57:26 -0000
Original-Received: from camel14.mindspring.com (207.69.200.64)
  by claymore.vcinet.com with SMTP; 2 Dec 1997 19:57:26 -0000
Original-Received: from ashanti.mastaler.com (ACCS-AS26-DP11.SNFC.grid.net [206.80.189.28])
	by camel14.mindspring.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA10363
	for <ding@gnus.org>; Tue, 2 Dec 1997 14:26:18 -0500 (EST)
Original-Received: (from jason@localhost)
	by ashanti.mastaler.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id MAA08142;
	Tue, 2 Dec 1997 12:23:45 -0700 (MST)
Original-To: ding@gnus.org
In-Reply-To: Steinar Bang's message of "02 Dec 1997 17:24:55 +0100"
Original-Lines: 16
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.5/XEmacs 20.3 - "Vatican City"
Precedence: list
X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:13119
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:13119

Steinar Bang <sb@metis.no> writes:

> Hm... maybe it's time for a closer look...?

Absolutely.  Compiling XEmacs with high optimization will help too.

> But I tend to favour the speed and responseness I get from 19.34.  Is
> it as good as 19.34 on the same platforms?

I can't say for sure, but it probably won't be as "fast".  But, Emacs
19.28 was faster than 19.34, etc.  You will be getting quite a few
substantial improvements with XEmacs 20.3 for a small price in speed.
IMO, GNU Emacs 19.34 and XEmacs 20.3 aren't even in the same league.
BTW, on my system XEmacs 20.3 is faster and more responsive than GNU
Emacs 20.2.