From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/12975 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: jdc@chow.mat.jhu.edu (Dan Christensen) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Quassia Gnus v0.16 is released Date: Tue, 25 Nov 1997 15:03:07 -0500 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035152421 6745 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 22:20:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 22:20:21 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from xemacs.org (xemacs.cs.uiuc.edu [128.174.252.16]) by altair.xemacs.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA15016 for ; Tue, 25 Nov 1997 14:04:36 -0800 Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA05562 for ; Tue, 25 Nov 1997 15:31:15 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from claymore.vcinet.com (claymore.vcinet.com [208.205.12.23]) by ifi.uio.no (8.8.8/8.8.7/ifi0.2) with SMTP id VAA08672 for ; Tue, 25 Nov 1997 21:03:22 +0100 (MET) Original-Received: (qmail 14123 invoked by uid 504); 25 Nov 1997 20:03:21 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 14120 invoked from network); 25 Nov 1997 20:03:21 -0000 Original-Received: from jhuml1.hcf.jhu.edu (128.220.2.86) by claymore.vcinet.com with SMTP; 25 Nov 1997 20:03:21 -0000 Original-Received: from chow.mat.jhu.edu by jhmail.hcf.jhu.edu (PMDF V5.1-10 #18666) with ESMTP id <01IQFIWVQLS6APTUKK@jhmail.hcf.jhu.edu> for ding@gnus.org; Tue, 25 Nov 1997 15:03:08 EDT Original-Received: (from jdc@localhost) by chow.mat.jhu.edu (8.7.6/8.7.3) id PAA03016; Tue, 25 Nov 1997 15:03:08 -0500 (EST) In-reply-to: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of "25 Nov 1997 19:09:37 +0100" Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Mailer: Quassia Gnus v0.16/Emacs 19.34 Original-Lines: 11 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:12975 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:12975 Has the updating of summary lines in v0.16 broken? When I hit `E' with point on an article, the article is marked as expirable but the summary line remains unchanged. Same with `d' to mark an article as read. But strangely `!' does update the summary line correctly. Dan -- Dan Christensen jdc@math.jhu.edu