From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/9693 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Rich Pieri Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Gnus v5.4.4 is released Date: 28 Jan 1997 17:34:23 -0500 Message-ID: References: <199701272113.QAA03158@swapsdvlp02.ny-swaps-develop.ml.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035149677 19956 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:34:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:34:37 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id OAA27215 for ; Tue, 28 Jan 1997 14:49:53 -0800 Original-Received: from londo.asds.com (londo.prescienttech.com [199.103.216.62]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Tue, 28 Jan 1997 23:35:04 +0100 Original-Received: from gkar.asds.com (gkar.asds.com [111.17.19.1]) by londo.asds.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id RAA22279 for ; Tue, 28 Jan 1997 17:35:02 -0500 Original-Received: (from ratinox@localhost) by gkar.asds.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) id RAA10721; Tue, 28 Jan 1997 17:34:28 -0500 Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no In-Reply-To: Sudish Joseph's message of 28 Jan 1997 16:14:29 -0500 Original-Lines: 41 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.2.40/Emacs 19.34 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9693 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9693 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>>>> "SJ" == Sudish Joseph writes: SJ> Per seems to have gone to great lengths to make sure that customize SJ> does not interfere with the person who likes to set stuff in SJ> .emacs/.gnus. I.e., you do not have to use it, set gnus-visual in SJ> your .gnus if you like. "Disabling" gnus-visual disables font properties (bold, underline, italic) along with colors, which is something I do not want. Setting gnus-display-type to 'mono disabled colors without disabling anything else. That functionality "vector" has been eliminated. Admittedly it was a hack, but it worked simply and elegantly, making it a prize among hacks. What I want to know, and nobody has provided an acceptable answer, yet, is what has replaced it. The utility that is supposed to make this nigh-effortless is nigh-unusable for exactly the reasons I need to use it. The documentation is either totally useless or nonexistant. The source code is some of the most convoluted I have ever seen. If I cannot find the answers in the "obvious" places, how can you expect J. Random User to find them? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.3a Charset: noconv iQCVAwUBMu5+8Z6VRH7BJMxHAQEqXQP/YxgG8bNB+BRQfBJvSqp7nFNwOPckepLx Sw12WhTQbpVKA2pRMELL2OFmUG9nAPvJ5xNazVnJig23hb1BwKF4iPCtTnvYm+1v PKnDRNQ6TjAknFCXgzMEezhXoNHhc3ckHQWYhT3/TdkXClxEk8HVBM6+51qgFqYG ZwWFuauKPg0= =IXGW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Rich Pieri | Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball. Prescient Technologies, Inc. | A Stone & Webster Company | I speak for myself, not PTI or SWEC |