From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/8336 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Pieri Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Japanese names & alphabetization Date: 11 Oct 1996 09:51:22 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035148513 11527 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:15:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:15:13 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 5125 invoked from smtpd); 11 Oct 1996 14:23:42 -0000 Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@129.240.64.2) by deanna.miranova.com with SMTP; 11 Oct 1996 14:23:41 -0000 Original-Received: from unilab.dfci.harvard.edu (unilab.dfci.harvard.edu [155.52.46.57]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Fri, 11 Oct 1996 15:52:20 +0200 Original-Received: (from ratinox@localhost) by unilab.dfci.harvard.edu (8.7.6/8.7.3) id JAA07422; Fri, 11 Oct 1996 09:51:48 -0400 (EDT) Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no In-Reply-To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of 10 Oct 1996 23:21:15 +0100 Original-Lines: 22 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.2.40/Emacs 19.34 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:8336 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:8336 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>>>> "LMI" == Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: LMI> So they cater to broken behavior? :-) Is a convention that works considered broken? :) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.3 Charset: noconv iQCVAwUBMl5Q256VRH7BJMxHAQHl2QP+PXe7VCQuIKxSpnCOp/k0MrthSWFAf7ID QXwQJp38O7Z2Tpc3CQSy7ULnC/vBLbuWIEHfVrVf/mD6VMFYShUqSd0tXNM0Ce5z MDauRkBngOVdWH2EtxpyuGCw1yLC/W/zrGfH/4HfrBEnbbcsD6ch/UPVURKOTsxi pBkrRl4Zl4Q= =u1K5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Richard Pieri/Information Services \ Curiosity never killed anything, except \ maybe a few hours. -A cat's guide to life http://www.dfci.harvard.edu/ \