From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/11736 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jason R Mastaler Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: compatibility of nnml and MH Date: 19 Jul 1997 13:49:19 -0600 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.106) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035151400 32197 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 22:03:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 22:03:20 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from xemacs.org (xemacs.cs.uiuc.edu [128.174.252.16]) by altair.xemacs.org (8.8.6/8.8.6) with ESMTP id OAA23060 for ; Sat, 19 Jul 1997 14:28:56 -0700 Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id QAA24344 for ; Sat, 19 Jul 1997 16:25:24 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from claymore.vcinet.com (claymore.vcinet.com [208.205.12.23]) by ifi.uio.no with SMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Sat, 19 Jul 1997 21:50:27 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 23152 invoked by uid 504); 19 Jul 1997 19:50:26 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 23149 invoked from network); 19 Jul 1997 19:50:26 -0000 Original-Received: from brickbat9.mindspring.com (207.69.200.12) by claymore.vcinet.com with SMTP; 19 Jul 1997 19:50:25 -0000 Original-Received: from ashanti.mastaler.com (ip242.albuquerque.nm.pub-ip.psi.net [38.11.185.242]) by brickbat9.mindspring.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA10242 for ; Sat, 19 Jul 1997 15:50:22 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: (from jason@localhost) by ashanti.mastaler.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id NAA15597; Sat, 19 Jul 1997 13:49:20 -0600 (MDT) Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: dsg@linus.mitre.org's message of "17 Jul 1997 08:29:50 -0400" Original-Lines: 15 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.63/XEmacs 19.15 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:11736 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:11736 dsg@linus.mitre.org (David S. Goldberg) writes: > At least when I did this (which was only from a fairly late version of > (ding) up to a very early release of September), I didn't have any > problem. Certainly you're right that the Xref headers wouldn't have > changed, but nnmh seemed to accept that the last article was whatever > file had the highest number in the folder and new ones were > incorporated with the next number up. Okay, this time I stopped and restarted Gnus after packing the folder with nmh and editing the range with `G E' and Gnus incorporated with the next number up. Thanks. Jason R. Mastaler jason@mastaler.com